Skip to main content
ShankuChakra
Payment Terms for Export Orders: LC, TT, and Advance Payment Explained

Payment Terms for Export Orders: LC, TT, and Advance Payment Explained

Payment terms are usually the last thing discussed after product, quantity, and Incoterm are settled — but they're just as much a negotiation as the rest of the order, and getting them wrong creates more disputes than a quality issue usually does. Here's what the common terms actually mean and where each one typically fits.

Advance Payment (Full or Partial)

The buyer pays some or all of the order value before production or shipment begins — commonly structured as a percentage upfront (for example, 30–50%) with the balance due before or against shipping documents. This is common for first orders and smaller shipments, since it gives the supplier confidence to commit resources without an established payment history with the buyer.

From a buyer's side, full advance payment on an unproven supplier relationship carries real risk — it's worth balancing against order size and how much history you have with that specific supplier.

Telegraphic Transfer (TT) / Wire Transfer

A direct bank-to-bank transfer, and the most commonly used payment method for India export trade generally. TT itself isn't a payment term so much as the mechanism — what matters is when the transfer happens relative to production and shipment. Common structures include an advance TT before production, a balance TT before shipment, or a split arrangement (e.g., 30% advance, 70% against shipping document copies).

TT is fast and low-cost compared to a letter of credit, but it carries less built-in structural protection for either party — the safeguard is really the trust and track record between buyer and supplier, not the mechanism itself.

Letter of Credit (LC)

An LC is a bank-issued guarantee: the buyer's bank commits to pay the supplier once the supplier presents documents proving the shipment was made according to agreed terms (bill of lading, invoice, packing list, and others as specified in the LC). This shifts payment risk from a direct buyer-supplier trust relationship onto the banks involved on both sides.

LCs are more commonly used for larger orders, new or higher-value supplier relationships, or when a buyer's own procurement policy requires bank-mediated payment security. They come with real overhead: bank fees on both sides, more paperwork precision required (documents must match the LC terms exactly, or payment can be delayed or refused on a technicality), and longer lead time to set up compared to a straightforward TT.

Which Term Is Typical at Each Stage

Relationship stageCommon structure
First order / sampleFull or high advance payment, paid via TT
Established relationship, moderate orderSplit TT — partial advance, balance before or against shipment
Large order, new relationship, or buyer procurement policy requires itLetter of Credit

None of this is fixed — it's a starting expectation, and the actual terms on any order are agreed between buyer and supplier directly.

Questions Worth Asking Before You Agree to Terms

  • What exactly triggers each payment milestone — order confirmation, production completion, or shipment?
  • If paying in advance, what happens if the order is delayed or the specification doesn't match on inspection?
  • If using an LC, has your bank confirmed it can issue on the terms the supplier is requesting, and what are the associated fees?
  • Is the payment currency and receiving bank detail confirmed in writing, separate from the commercial invoice, to reduce the risk of a fraudulent last-minute bank-detail change?

Get Started

Request a Product Quotation

Share your product requirements, quantity, destination and packaging preferences — we’ll come back with specification, availability and next steps.